Partnering with Wastewater Plants for Sustainable Disposal

Partnering with Wastewater Plants for Sustainable Disposal

Factors Influencing Portable Toilet Requirements

The concept of "The Untapped Potential: Porta Potty Waste and Wastewater Plants" presents an innovative approach to sustainable waste management through the partnership between portable toilet services and municipal wastewater treatment facilities. Emergency restroom rentals become crucial during Virginia's hurricane season when permanent facilities may be compromised luxury porta potty rental cost Toilet seat. In our pursuit of environmental sustainability, its crucial to explore every avenue where waste can be transformed from a problem into a resource.


Portable toilets, commonly used at outdoor events, construction sites, and festivals, generate a significant amount of human waste that must be disposed of responsibly. Traditionally, this waste has been viewed as merely something to be rid of, often ending up in landfills or being treated separately which can be both costly and less efficient. However, by partnering with wastewater plants, we open up a new realm of possibilities for managing this waste stream in a more eco-friendly manner.


Wastewater treatment plants are designed to handle large volumes of sewage from residential and commercial sources, breaking down organic matter and removing contaminants before safely returning water to the environment or repurposing it for non-potable uses. By integrating porta potty waste into these systems, we leverage existing infrastructure that is already adept at processing similar types of waste. This not only reduces the environmental footprint but also cuts down on the operational costs associated with separate treatment processes.


The synergy between porta potty services and wastewater plants could lead to several benefits. Firstly, it promotes a closed-loop system where nutrients from human waste are captured and potentially converted into biogas or biosolids for agricultural use, reducing dependency on chemical fertilizers. Secondly, this partnership encourages better regulatory compliance since wastewater plants are subject to strict environmental standards, ensuring that even portable toilet waste is treated with high efficiency.


Moreover, such partnerships foster community engagement by demonstrating practical steps towards sustainability. It educates the public about the lifecycle of their waste and how local facilities contribute to environmental health. For event organizers or construction companies utilizing porta potties, knowing their waste disposal contributes positively to local sustainability efforts can enhance their green credentials.


However, implementing this system requires overcoming logistical challenges like transportation logistics and timing coordination between service providers and plant schedules. It also necessitates clear communication channels for reporting and accountability to ensure all parties meet environmental regulations.


In conclusion, the untapped potential in partnering porta potty services with wastewater plants lies not just in efficient waste disposal but in transforming an overlooked byproduct into a resource for energy production or agriculture. This collaboration underscores a broader commitment to sustainable practices where every form of waste is considered for its potential contribution to ecological balance rather than simply discarded. As we continue to innovate within environmental management, such partnerships exemplify how traditional sectors can evolve towards greener operations for the benefit of our planet.

Benefits of Partnership: A Win-Win for Rental Companies and Plants


In the quest for sustainable development, collaboration between different sectors has become increasingly important. One such partnership that is proving to be mutually beneficial is the collaboration between rental companies and wastewater treatment plants. By working together, these entities can achieve their respective goals while contributing to a cleaner and more sustainable environment.


For rental companies, partnering with wastewater treatment plants offers a unique opportunity to address the growing concern of waste disposal. By entrusting their waste management to these plants, rental companies can ensure that their waste is disposed of in an environmentally friendly manner. This not only helps in reducing their carbon footprint but also demonstrates their commitment to sustainability. Moreover, rental companies can benefit from the expertise and resources that wastewater treatment plants possess, ensuring that their waste is handled efficiently and effectively.


On the other hand, wastewater treatment plants stand to gain significantly from this partnership. By collaborating with rental companies, these plants can secure a steady and reliable source of waste, which can be processed and treated to minimize environmental impact. This not only helps in reducing the overall waste burden on the plants but also ensures a consistent revenue stream. Furthermore, the partnership allows wastewater treatment plants to showcase their capabilities in waste management and sustainability, enhancing their reputation and credibility.


In addition to the direct benefits, this partnership also contributes to the broader goal of sustainable development. By working together, rental companies and wastewater treatment plants can help in reducing the overall waste generated, promoting recycling and reuse, and minimizing the impact of waste on the environment. This not only helps in conserving natural resources but also contributes to the creation of a cleaner and healthier planet for future generations.


In conclusion, the partnership between rental companies and wastewater treatment plants is a prime example of how collaboration can lead to a win-win situation for all parties involved. By working together, these entities can achieve their respective goals while contributing to a more sustainable future. As the world continues to grapple with the challenges of waste management and sustainability, such partnerships will play a crucial role in driving positive change and creating a better world for all.

Duration of the Event and Toilet Needs

Navigating the complex landscape of regulations and compliance for waste disposal is a critical task for any organization committed to sustainability. When partnering with wastewater plants for sustainable disposal, understanding and adhering to these regulations becomes even more pivotal. This partnership not only helps in managing waste effectively but also aligns with environmental stewardship goals.


Firstly, regulatory compliance involves staying updated with local, national, and sometimes international laws that govern waste management. These laws are designed to protect the environment by controlling what can be discharged into water systems. For instance, the Clean Water Act in the United States sets stringent guidelines on pollutants that can be released into waterways, which directly impacts how wastewater plants operate.


When partnering with wastewater treatment facilities, companies must ensure their waste meets specific criteria before its accepted. This often requires pre-treatment processes to remove or reduce harmful substances. Here, communication is key; regular dialogues with plant managers help in understanding what pre-treatment might be necessary or if there are changes in regulatory standards.


Moreover, compliance isnt just about following rules; its about proactive engagement. Companies should participate in environmental audits and seek certifications like ISO 14001, which demonstrate a commitment to environmental management systems that include waste handling protocols. Such certifications can streamline processes when dealing with wastewater plants as they provide a framework of trust and efficiency.


The partnership also benefits from shared knowledge and resources. Wastewater plants often have expert staff who can offer insights into emerging technologies or methods for waste reduction at the source, which could lead to cost savings and decreased environmental impact for the company. Additionally, collaborative efforts can lead to innovative solutions like converting waste into energy or valuable by-products through advanced treatment processes.


In conclusion, navigating regulations and compliance in the context of partnering with wastewater plants requires diligence, open communication, and a commitment to continuous improvement. By working closely with these facilities, companies not only comply with legal standards but also contribute positively to sustainability efforts, ensuring that their operations support broader ecological health while maintaining business efficacy. This symbiotic relationship fosters a greener future where industrial activity harmonizes with environmental preservation.

Duration of the Event and Toilet Needs

Special Considerations for Different Event Types

When considering the integration of porta potty waste into municipal wastewater treatment plants, pre-treatment options play a crucial role in ensuring a sustainable and efficient disposal process. Porta potty waste, which includes human excreta, toilet paper, and various chemicals used for odor control and sanitation, poses unique challenges when introduced into standard wastewater systems. Therefore, implementing effective pre-treatment methods is vital for both the environment and the operational efficiency of wastewater plants.


One primary pre-treatment option involves the use of screening processes to remove large solids before the waste enters the plant. This step prevents blockages in the plants infrastructure by filtering out non-biodegradable items like wet wipes or sanitary products that are often improperly disposed of in porta potties. Following screening, sedimentation tanks can be employed to allow heavier particles to settle at the bottom, reducing the load on subsequent treatment stages.


Chemical treatment is another approach where specific reagents are added to neutralize or break down harmful chemicals present in porta potty waste. This not only helps in reducing toxicity but also aids in breaking down complex organic materials into simpler forms that are easier for biological treatment processes at the plant to handle. For instance, adding coagulants can help aggregate fine particles together, making them easier to remove during sedimentation.


Biological pre-treatment through anaerobic digestion offers an environmentally friendly method where organic material is broken down by bacteria in an oxygen-free environment. This process not only reduces the volume of waste but also produces biogas, which can be harnessed as an energy source, promoting sustainability.


Moreover, dewatering techniques such as centrifugation or belt presses can extract water from the sludge, concentrating it before transport or further treatment at the plant. This step reduces transportation costs and simplifies handling due to decreased volume and weight.


In partnering with wastewater plants for sustainable disposal solutions, these pre-treatment options ensure that porta potty waste does not overwhelm existing systems but instead integrates smoothly. By preparing this waste adequately, we not only protect our wastewater infrastructure but also contribute positively towards a circular economy where waste products are utilized efficiently rather than discarded recklessly. Thus, adopting comprehensive pre-treatment strategies is essential for fostering partnerships that prioritize environmental stewardship alongside practical waste management solutions.

Case Studies: Successful Partnerships in Action for Sustainable Disposal at Wastewater Plants


Introduction


In todays world, the need for sustainable disposal practices has become more crucial than ever. One of the most effective ways to achieve this goal is through successful partnerships between various stakeholders, including wastewater plants, local governments, and private companies. This essay will explore some case studies that demonstrate the power of collaboration in creating sustainable disposal solutions.


Case Study 1: The City of San Francisco and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission


The City of San Francisco and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) have been working together to implement a sustainable disposal program for their wastewater treatment plants. By partnering with local businesses and organizations, they have successfully reduced waste and increased recycling efforts. One notable initiative is the "Green Business Program," which encourages local businesses to adopt environmentally friendly practices, such as reducing waste and using sustainable materials. This partnership has led to a significant reduction in waste sent to landfills and has helped to create a more sustainable future for the city.


Case Study 2: The City of Portland and the Portland Bureau of Environmental Services


The City of Portland and the Portland Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) have collaborated to create a comprehensive sustainable disposal program for their wastewater treatment plants. This partnership has focused on reducing waste, increasing recycling efforts, and promoting the use of renewable energy sources. One of the most successful initiatives has been the "Zero Waste Portland" program, which aims to divert 80% of waste from landfills by 2040. This partnership has led to a significant reduction in waste sent to landfills and has helped to create a more sustainable future for the city.


Case Study 3: The City of Austin and the Austin Energy GreenGrid Program


The City of Austin and the Austin Energy GreenGrid Program have partnered to create a sustainable disposal program for their wastewater treatment plants. This partnership has focused on reducing waste, increasing recycling efforts, and promoting the use of renewable energy sources. One of the most successful initiatives has been the "Green Building Program," which encourages local businesses and organizations to adopt environmentally friendly practices, such as reducing waste and using sustainable materials. This partnership has led to a significant reduction in waste sent to landfills and has helped to create a more sustainable future for the city.


Conclusion


These case studies demonstrate the power of successful partnerships in creating sustainable disposal solutions for wastewater treatment plants. By working together, local governments, private companies, and other stakeholders can create innovative and effective programs that reduce waste, increase recycling efforts, and promote the use of renewable energy sources. As the need for sustainable disposal practices continues to grow, these partnerships will play an increasingly important role in shaping a more sustainable future for our communities.

Addressing Concerns: Odor Control and Environmental Impact for Partnering with Wastewater Plants for Sustainable Disposal


In todays world, where environmental sustainability is paramount, the collaboration between businesses and wastewater treatment plants has become a crucial aspect of responsible waste management. One of the significant challenges in this partnership is addressing concerns related to odor control and environmental impact. These concerns are not only about the immediate effects on the local community but also about the long-term sustainability of our planet.


Odor control is a primary concern when dealing with wastewater. The unpleasant smells that can emanate from wastewater treatment facilities can be a significant nuisance to nearby communities. This issue can be mitigated through advanced treatment technologies and effective management practices. For instance, the use of biofilters and activated carbon can help in reducing volatile organic compounds that contribute to odors. Moreover, the implementation of closed systems and regular monitoring can ensure that the levels of odor-causing substances are kept to a minimum.


Environmental impact is another critical aspect that needs to be addressed in the partnership between businesses and wastewater plants. The discharge of untreated or inadequately treated wastewater can lead to severe environmental degradation, affecting water quality, soil health, and biodiversity. By working closely with wastewater treatment facilities, businesses can ensure that their waste is treated to meet stringent environmental standards before being discharged. This includes the removal of harmful chemicals, pathogens, and nutrients that can cause eutrophication and other ecological imbalances.


Sustainable disposal practices are essential in minimizing the environmental footprint of waste management. This involves not only treating the wastewater but also finding ways to recycle and reuse the treated water. For example, treated wastewater can be used for irrigation, industrial processes, or even replenishing groundwater supplies. Such practices not only reduce the burden on freshwater resources but also contribute to a circular economy, where waste is seen as a valuable resource.


In conclusion, addressing concerns related to odor control and environmental impact is vital for successful partnerships between businesses and wastewater treatment plants. By investing in advanced technologies and sustainable practices, it is possible to manage waste effectively while minimizing the impact on the environment and the community. This collaborative approach is essential for achieving a sustainable future where economic growth and environmental stewardship go hand in hand.

Partnering with wastewater plants for sustainable disposal offers significant economic advantages, primarily through cost savings and revenue opportunities. From a cost-saving perspective, businesses that engage in such partnerships can drastically reduce their waste management expenses. Traditional disposal methods often involve high fees for landfill use or incineration, not to mention the environmental costs associated with these practices. By collaborating with wastewater treatment facilities, companies can transform their waste into less harmful byproducts or even valuable resources, thereby cutting down on disposal costs.


Moreover, these partnerships open up avenues for revenue generation. Wastewater plants are increasingly equipped to convert organic waste into biogas or other forms of bioenergy through processes like anaerobic digestion. Companies that supply waste materials to these plants can benefit from shared profits or reduced utility bills if they utilize the energy produced. For instance, food processing plants might find a lucrative opportunity in selling their organic waste as feedstock for biogas production, turning what was once a disposal liability into an asset.


Additionally, these collaborations enhance corporate sustainability profiles, which can indirectly boost revenue by attracting environmentally conscious consumers and investors. A positive public image related to environmental stewardship can lead to increased market share or premium pricing for products that are marketed as eco-friendly.


In summary, the economic benefits of partnering with wastewater plants for sustainable disposal are twofold: direct financial savings from reduced disposal costs and potential income from innovative waste-to-energy conversions. These partnerships not only make economic sense but also contribute to broader environmental goals, creating a win-win scenario for businesses and the planet alike.

 

An Ab anbar (water reservoir) with double domes and windcatchers (openings near the top of the towers) in the central desert city of Naeen, Iran. Windcatchers are a form of natural ventilation.[1]

Ventilation is the intentional introduction of outdoor air into a space. Ventilation is mainly used to control indoor air quality by diluting and displacing indoor effluents and pollutants. It can also be used to control indoor temperature, humidity, and air motion to benefit thermal comfort, satisfaction with other aspects of the indoor environment, or other objectives.

The intentional introduction of outdoor air is usually categorized as either mechanical ventilation, natural ventilation, or mixed-mode ventilation.[2]

  • Mechanical ventilation is the intentional fan-driven flow of outdoor air into and/or out from a building. Mechanical ventilation systems may include supply fans (which push outdoor air into a building), exhaust[3] fans (which draw air out of a building and thereby cause equal ventilation flow into a building), or a combination of both (called balanced ventilation if it neither pressurizes nor depressurizes the inside air,[3] or only slightly depressurizes it). Mechanical ventilation is often provided by equipment that is also used to heat and cool a space.
  • Natural ventilation is the intentional passive flow of outdoor air into a building through planned openings (such as louvers, doors, and windows). Natural ventilation does not require mechanical systems to move outdoor air. Instead, it relies entirely on passive physical phenomena, such as wind pressure, or the stack effect. Natural ventilation openings may be fixed, or adjustable. Adjustable openings may be controlled automatically (automated), owned by occupants (operable), or a combination of both. Cross ventilation is a phenomenon of natural ventilation.
  • Mixed-mode ventilation systems use both mechanical and natural processes. The mechanical and natural components may be used at the same time, at different times of day, or in different seasons of the year.[4] Since natural ventilation flow depends on environmental conditions, it may not always provide an appropriate amount of ventilation. In this case, mechanical systems may be used to supplement or regulate the naturally driven flow.

Ventilation is typically described as separate from infiltration.

  • Infiltration is the circumstantial flow of air from outdoors to indoors through leaks (unplanned openings) in a building envelope. When a building design relies on infiltration to maintain indoor air quality, this flow has been referred to as adventitious ventilation.[5]

The design of buildings that promote occupant health and well-being requires a clear understanding of the ways that ventilation airflow interacts with, dilutes, displaces, or introduces pollutants within the occupied space. Although ventilation is an integral component of maintaining good indoor air quality, it may not be satisfactory alone.[6] A clear understanding of both indoor and outdoor air quality parameters is needed to improve the performance of ventilation in terms of occupant health and energy.[7] In scenarios where outdoor pollution would deteriorate indoor air quality, other treatment devices such as filtration may also be necessary.[8] In kitchen ventilation systems, or for laboratory fume hoods, the design of effective effluent capture can be more important than the bulk amount of ventilation in a space. More generally, the way that an air distribution system causes ventilation to flow into and out of a space impacts the ability of a particular ventilation rate to remove internally generated pollutants. The ability of a system to reduce pollution in space is described as its "ventilation effectiveness". However, the overall impacts of ventilation on indoor air quality can depend on more complex factors such as the sources of pollution, and the ways that activities and airflow interact to affect occupant exposure.

An array of factors related to the design and operation of ventilation systems are regulated by various codes and standards. Standards dealing with the design and operation of ventilation systems to achieve acceptable indoor air quality include the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standards 62.1 and 62.2, the International Residential Code, the International Mechanical Code, and the United Kingdom Building Regulations Part F. Other standards that focus on energy conservation also impact the design and operation of ventilation systems, including ASHRAE Standard 90.1, and the International Energy Conservation Code.

When indoor and outdoor conditions are favorable, increasing ventilation beyond the minimum required for indoor air quality can significantly improve both indoor air quality and thermal comfort through ventilative cooling, which also helps reduce the energy demand of buildings.[9][10] During these times, higher ventilation rates, achieved through passive or mechanical means (air-side economizer, ventilative pre-cooling), can be particularly beneficial for enhancing people's physical health.[11] Conversely, when conditions are less favorable, maintaining or improving indoor air quality through ventilation may require increased use of mechanical heating or cooling, leading to higher energy consumption.

Ventilation should be considered for its relationship to "venting" for appliances and combustion equipment such as water heaters, furnaces, boilers, and wood stoves. Most importantly, building ventilation design must be careful to avoid the backdraft of combustion products from "naturally vented" appliances into the occupied space. This issue is of greater importance for buildings with more air-tight envelopes. To avoid the hazard, many modern combustion appliances utilize "direct venting" which draws combustion air directly from outdoors, instead of from the indoor environment.

Design of air flow in rooms

[edit]

The air in a room can be supplied and removed in several ways, for example via ceiling ventilation, cross ventilation, floor ventilation or displacement ventilation.[citation needed]

Furthermore, the air can be circulated in the room using vortexes which can be initiated in various ways:

Ventilation rates for indoor air quality

[edit]

The ventilation rate, for commercial, industrial, and institutional (CII) buildings, is normally expressed by the volumetric flow rate of outdoor air, introduced to the building. The typical units used are cubic feet per minute (CFM) in the imperial system, or liters per second (L/s) in the metric system (even though cubic meter per second is the preferred unit for volumetric flow rate in the SI system of units). The ventilation rate can also be expressed on a per person or per unit floor area basis, such as CFM/p or CFM/ft², or as air changes per hour (ACH).

Standards for residential buildings

[edit]

For residential buildings, which mostly rely on infiltration for meeting their ventilation needs, a common ventilation rate measure is the air change rate (or air changes per hour): the hourly ventilation rate divided by the volume of the space (I or ACH; units of 1/h). During the winter, ACH may range from 0.50 to 0.41 in a tightly air-sealed house to 1.11 to 1.47 in a loosely air-sealed house.[12]

ASHRAE now recommends ventilation rates dependent upon floor area, as a revision to the 62-2001 standard, in which the minimum ACH was 0.35, but no less than 15 CFM/person (7.1 L/s/person). As of 2003, the standard has been changed to 3 CFM/100 sq. ft. (15 L/s/100 sq. m.) plus 7.5 CFM/person (3.5 L/s/person).[13]

Standards for commercial buildings

[edit]

Ventilation rate procedure

[edit]

Ventilation Rate Procedure is rate based on standard and prescribes the rate at which ventilation air must be delivered to space and various means to the condition that air.[14] Air quality is assessed (through CO2 measurement) and ventilation rates are mathematically derived using constants.Indoor Air Quality Procedure uses one or more guidelines for the specification of acceptable concentrations of certain contaminants in indoor air but does not prescribe ventilation rates or air treatment methods.[14] This addresses both quantitative and subjective evaluations and is based on the Ventilation Rate Procedure. It also accounts for potential contaminants that may have no measured limits, or for which no limits are not set (such as formaldehyde off-gassing from carpet and furniture).

Natural ventilation

[edit]

Natural ventilation harnesses naturally available forces to supply and remove air in an enclosed space. Poor ventilation in rooms is identified to significantly increase the localized moldy smell in specific places of the room including room corners.[11] There are three types of natural ventilation occurring in buildings: wind-driven ventilation, pressure-driven flows, and stack ventilation.[15] The pressures generated by 'the stack effect' rely upon the buoyancy of heated or rising air. Wind-driven ventilation relies upon the force of the prevailing wind to pull and push air through the enclosed space as well as through breaches in the building's envelope.

Almost all historic buildings were ventilated naturally.[16] The technique was generally abandoned in larger US buildings during the late 20th century as the use of air conditioning became more widespread. However, with the advent of advanced Building Performance Simulation (BPS) software, improved Building Automation Systems (BAS), Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) design requirements, and improved window manufacturing techniques; natural ventilation has made a resurgence in commercial buildings both globally and throughout the US.[17]

The benefits of natural ventilation include:

  • Improved indoor air quality (IAQ)
  • Energy savings
  • Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
  • Occupant control
  • Reduction in occupant illness associated with sick building syndrome
  • Increased worker productivity

Techniques and architectural features used to ventilate buildings and structures naturally include, but are not limited to:

  • Operable windows
  • Clerestory windows and vented skylights
  • Lev/convection doors
  • Night purge ventilation
  • Building orientation
  • Wind capture façades

Airborne diseases

[edit]

Natural ventilation is a key factor in reducing the spread of airborne illnesses such as tuberculosis, the common cold, influenza, meningitis or COVID-19.[18] Opening doors and windows are good ways to maximize natural ventilation, which would make the risk of airborne contagion much lower than with costly and maintenance-requiring mechanical systems. Old-fashioned clinical areas with high ceilings and large windows provide the greatest protection. Natural ventilation costs little and is maintenance-free, and is particularly suited to limited-resource settings and tropical climates, where the burden of TB and institutional TB transmission is highest. In settings where respiratory isolation is difficult and climate permits, windows and doors should be opened to reduce the risk of airborne contagion. Natural ventilation requires little maintenance and is inexpensive.[19]

Natural ventilation is not practical in much of the infrastructure because of climate. This means that the facilities need to have effective mechanical ventilation systems and or use Ceiling Level UV or FAR UV ventilation systems.

Ventilation is measured in terms of air changes per hour (ACH). As of 2023, the CDC recommends that all spaces have a minimum of 5 ACH.[20] For hospital rooms with airborne contagions the CDC recommends a minimum of 12 ACH.[21] Challenges in facility ventilation are public unawareness,[22][23] ineffective government oversight, poor building codes that are based on comfort levels, poor system operations, poor maintenance, and lack of transparency.[24]

Pressure, both political and economic, to improve energy conservation has led to decreased ventilation rates. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning rates have dropped since the energy crisis in the 1970s and the banning of cigarette smoke in the 1980s and 1990s.[25][26][better source needed]

Mechanical ventilation

[edit]
An axial belt-drive exhaust fan serving an underground car park. This exhaust fan's operation is interlocked with the concentration of contaminants emitted by internal combustion engines.

Mechanical ventilation of buildings and structures can be achieved by the use of the following techniques:

  • Whole-house ventilation
  • Mixing ventilation
  • Displacement ventilation
  • Dedicated subaerial air supply

Demand-controlled ventilation (DCV)

[edit]

Demand-controlled ventilation (DCV, also known as Demand Control Ventilation) makes it possible to maintain air quality while conserving energy.[27][28] ASHRAE has determined that "It is consistent with the ventilation rate procedure that demand control be permitted for use to reduce the total outdoor air supply during periods of less occupancy."[29] In a DCV system, CO2 sensors control the amount of ventilation.[30][31] During peak occupancy, CO2 levels rise, and the system adjusts to deliver the same amount of outdoor air as would be used by the ventilation-rate procedure.[32] However, when spaces are less occupied, CO2 levels reduce, and the system reduces ventilation to conserves energy. DCV is a well-established practice,[33] and is required in high occupancy spaces by building energy standards such as ASHRAE 90.1.[34]

Personalized ventilation

[edit]

Personalized ventilation is an air distribution strategy that allows individuals to control the amount of ventilation received. The approach delivers fresh air more directly to the breathing zone and aims to improve the air quality of inhaled air. Personalized ventilation provides much higher ventilation effectiveness than conventional mixing ventilation systems by displacing pollution from the breathing zone with far less air volume. Beyond improved air quality benefits, the strategy can also improve occupants' thermal comfort, perceived air quality, and overall satisfaction with the indoor environment. Individuals' preferences for temperature and air movement are not equal, and so traditional approaches to homogeneous environmental control have failed to achieve high occupant satisfaction. Techniques such as personalized ventilation facilitate control of a more diverse thermal environment that can improve thermal satisfaction for most occupants.

Local exhaust ventilation

[edit]

Local exhaust ventilation addresses the issue of avoiding the contamination of indoor air by specific high-emission sources by capturing airborne contaminants before they are spread into the environment. This can include water vapor control, lavatory effluent control, solvent vapors from industrial processes, and dust from wood- and metal-working machinery. Air can be exhausted through pressurized hoods or the use of fans and pressurizing a specific area.[35]
A local exhaust system is composed of five basic parts:

  1. A hood that captures the contaminant at its source
  2. Ducts for transporting the air
  3. An air-cleaning device that removes/minimizes the contaminant
  4. A fan that moves the air through the system
  5. An exhaust stack through which the contaminated air is discharged[35]

In the UK, the use of LEV systems has regulations set out by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) which are referred to as the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (CoSHH). Under CoSHH, legislation is set to protect users of LEV systems by ensuring that all equipment is tested at least every fourteen months to ensure the LEV systems are performing adequately. All parts of the system must be visually inspected and thoroughly tested and where any parts are found to be defective, the inspector must issue a red label to identify the defective part and the issue.

The owner of the LEV system must then have the defective parts repaired or replaced before the system can be used.

Smart ventilation

[edit]

Smart ventilation is a process of continually adjusting the ventilation system in time, and optionally by location, to provide the desired IAQ benefits while minimizing energy consumption, utility bills, and other non-IAQ costs (such as thermal discomfort or noise). A smart ventilation system adjusts ventilation rates in time or by location in a building to be responsive to one or more of the following: occupancy, outdoor thermal and air quality conditions, electricity grid needs, direct sensing of contaminants, operation of other air moving and air cleaning systems. In addition, smart ventilation systems can provide information to building owners, occupants, and managers on operational energy consumption and indoor air quality as well as a signal when systems need maintenance or repair. Being responsive to occupancy means that a smart ventilation system can adjust ventilation depending on demand such as reducing ventilation if the building is unoccupied. Smart ventilation can time-shift ventilation to periods when a) indoor-outdoor temperature differences are smaller (and away from peak outdoor temperatures and humidity), b) when indoor-outdoor temperatures are appropriate for ventilative cooling, or c) when outdoor air quality is acceptable. Being responsive to electricity grid needs means providing flexibility to electricity demand (including direct signals from utilities) and integration with electric grid control strategies. Smart ventilation systems can have sensors to detect airflow, systems pressures, or fan energy use in such a way that systems failures can be detected and repaired, as well as when system components need maintenance, such as filter replacement.[36]

Ventilation and combustion

[edit]

Combustion (in a fireplace, gas heater, candle, oil lamp, etc.) consumes oxygen while producing carbon dioxide and other unhealthy gases and smoke, requiring ventilation air. An open chimney promotes infiltration (i.e. natural ventilation) because of the negative pressure change induced by the buoyant, warmer air leaving through the chimney. The warm air is typically replaced by heavier, cold air.

Ventilation in a structure is also needed for removing water vapor produced by respiration, burning, and cooking, and for removing odors. If water vapor is permitted to accumulate, it may damage the structure, insulation, or finishes. [citation needed] When operating, an air conditioner usually removes excess moisture from the air. A dehumidifier may also be appropriate for removing airborne moisture.

Calculation for acceptable ventilation rate

[edit]

Ventilation guidelines are based on the minimum ventilation rate required to maintain acceptable levels of effluents. Carbon dioxide is used as a reference point, as it is the gas of highest emission at a relatively constant value of 0.005 L/s. The mass balance equation is:

Q = G/ (Ci − Ca)

  • Q = ventilation rate (L/s)
  • G = CO2 generation rate
  • Ci = acceptable indoor CO2 concentration
  • Ca = ambient CO2 concentration[37]

Smoking and ventilation

[edit]

ASHRAE standard 62 states that air removed from an area with environmental tobacco smoke shall not be recirculated into ETS-free air. A space with ETS requires more ventilation to achieve similar perceived air quality to that of a non-smoking environment.

The amount of ventilation in an ETS area is equal to the amount of an ETS-free area plus the amount V, where:

V = DSD × VA × A/60E

  • V = recommended extra flow rate in CFM (L/s)
  • DSD = design smoking density (estimated number of cigarettes smoked per hour per unit area)
  • VA = volume of ventilation air per cigarette for the room being designed (ft3/cig)
  • E = contaminant removal effectiveness[38]

History

[edit]
This ancient Roman house uses a variety of passive cooling and passive ventilation techniques. Heavy masonry walls, small exterior windows, and a narrow walled garden oriented N-S shade the house, preventing heat gain. The house opens onto a central atrium with an impluvium (open to the sky); the evaporative cooling of the water causes a cross-draft from atrium to garden.

Primitive ventilation systems were found at the Pločnik archeological site (belonging to the Vinča culture) in Serbia and were built into early copper smelting furnaces. The furnace, built on the outside of the workshop, featured earthen pipe-like air vents with hundreds of tiny holes in them and a prototype chimney to ensure air goes into the furnace to feed the fire and smoke comes out safely.[39]

Passive ventilation and passive cooling systems were widely written about around the Mediterranean by Classical times. Both sources of heat and sources of cooling (such as fountains and subterranean heat reservoirs) were used to drive air circulation, and buildings were designed to encourage or exclude drafts, according to climate and function. Public bathhouses were often particularly sophisticated in their heating and cooling. Icehouses are some millennia old, and were part of a well-developed ice industry by classical times.

The development of forced ventilation was spurred by the common belief in the late 18th and early 19th century in the miasma theory of disease, where stagnant 'airs' were thought to spread illness. An early method of ventilation was the use of a ventilating fire near an air vent which would forcibly cause the air in the building to circulate. English engineer John Theophilus Desaguliers provided an early example of this when he installed ventilating fires in the air tubes on the roof of the House of Commons. Starting with the Covent Garden Theatre, gas burning chandeliers on the ceiling were often specially designed to perform a ventilating role.

Mechanical systems

[edit]
The Central Tower of the Palace of Westminster. This octagonal spire was for ventilation purposes, in the more complex system imposed by Reid on Barry, in which it was to draw air out of the Palace. The design was for the aesthetic disguise of its function.[40][41]

A more sophisticated system involving the use of mechanical equipment to circulate the air was developed in the mid-19th century. A basic system of bellows was put in place to ventilate Newgate Prison and outlying buildings, by the engineer Stephen Hales in the mid-1700s. The problem with these early devices was that they required constant human labor to operate. David Boswell Reid was called to testify before a Parliamentary committee on proposed architectural designs for the new House of Commons, after the old one burned down in a fire in 1834.[40] In January 1840 Reid was appointed by the committee for the House of Lords dealing with the construction of the replacement for the Houses of Parliament. The post was in the capacity of ventilation engineer, in effect; and with its creation there began a long series of quarrels between Reid and Charles Barry, the architect.[42]

Reid advocated the installation of a very advanced ventilation system in the new House. His design had air being drawn into an underground chamber, where it would undergo either heating or cooling. It would then ascend into the chamber through thousands of small holes drilled into the floor, and would be extracted through the ceiling by a special ventilation fire within a great stack.[43]

Reid's reputation was made by his work in Westminster. He was commissioned for an air quality survey in 1837 by the Leeds and Selby Railway in their tunnel.[44] The steam vessels built for the Niger expedition of 1841 were fitted with ventilation systems based on Reid's Westminster model.[45] Air was dried, filtered and passed over charcoal.[46][47] Reid's ventilation method was also applied more fully to St. George's Hall, Liverpool, where the architect, Harvey Lonsdale Elmes, requested that Reid should be involved in ventilation design.[48] Reid considered this the only building in which his system was completely carried out.[49]

Fans

[edit]

With the advent of practical steam power, ceiling fans could finally be used for ventilation. Reid installed four steam-powered fans in the ceiling of St George's Hospital in Liverpool, so that the pressure produced by the fans would force the incoming air upward and through vents in the ceiling. Reid's pioneering work provides the basis for ventilation systems to this day.[43] He was remembered as "Dr. Reid the ventilator" in the twenty-first century in discussions of energy efficiency, by Lord Wade of Chorlton.[50]

History and development of ventilation rate standards

[edit]

Ventilating a space with fresh air aims to avoid "bad air". The study of what constitutes bad air dates back to the 1600s when the scientist Mayow studied asphyxia of animals in confined bottles.[51] The poisonous component of air was later identified as carbon dioxide (CO2), by Lavoisier in the very late 1700s, starting a debate as to the nature of "bad air" which humans perceive to be stuffy or unpleasant. Early hypotheses included excess concentrations of CO2 and oxygen depletion. However, by the late 1800s, scientists thought biological contamination, not oxygen or CO2, was the primary component of unacceptable indoor air. However, it was noted as early as 1872 that CO2 concentration closely correlates to perceived air quality.

The first estimate of minimum ventilation rates was developed by Tredgold in 1836.[52] This was followed by subsequent studies on the topic by Billings [53] in 1886 and Flugge in 1905. The recommendations of Billings and Flugge were incorporated into numerous building codes from 1900–the 1920s and published as an industry standard by ASHVE (the predecessor to ASHRAE) in 1914.[51]

The study continued into the varied effects of thermal comfort, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and biological contaminants. The research was conducted with human subjects in controlled test chambers. Two studies, published between 1909 and 1911, showed that carbon dioxide was not the offending component. Subjects remained satisfied in chambers with high levels of CO2, so long as the chamber remained cool.[51] (Subsequently, it has been determined that CO2 is, in fact, harmful at concentrations over 50,000ppm[54])

ASHVE began a robust research effort in 1919. By 1935, ASHVE-funded research conducted by Lemberg, Brandt, and Morse – again using human subjects in test chambers – suggested the primary component of "bad air" was an odor, perceived by the human olfactory nerves.[55] Human response to odor was found to be logarithmic to contaminant concentrations, and related to temperature. At lower, more comfortable temperatures, lower ventilation rates were satisfactory. A 1936 human test chamber study by Yaglou, Riley, and Coggins culminated much of this effort, considering odor, room volume, occupant age, cooling equipment effects, and recirculated air implications, which guided ventilation rates.[56] The Yagle research has been validated, and adopted into industry standards, beginning with the ASA code in 1946. From this research base, ASHRAE (having replaced ASHVE) developed space-by-space recommendations, and published them as ASHRAE Standard 62-1975: Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality.

As more architecture incorporated mechanical ventilation, the cost of outdoor air ventilation came under some scrutiny. In 1973, in response to the 1973 oil crisis and conservation concerns, ASHRAE Standards 62-73 and 62–81) reduced required ventilation from 10 CFM (4.76 L/s) per person to 5 CFM (2.37 L/s) per person. In cold, warm, humid, or dusty climates, it is preferable to minimize ventilation with outdoor air to conserve energy, cost, or filtration. This critique (e.g. Tiller[57]) led ASHRAE to reduce outdoor ventilation rates in 1981, particularly in non-smoking areas. However subsequent research by Fanger,[58] W. Cain, and Janssen validated the Yagle model. The reduced ventilation rates were found to be a contributing factor to sick building syndrome.[59]

The 1989 ASHRAE standard (Standard 62–89) states that appropriate ventilation guidelines are 20 CFM (9.2 L/s) per person in an office building, and 15 CFM (7.1 L/s) per person for schools, while 2004 Standard 62.1-2004 has lower recommendations again (see tables below). ANSI/ASHRAE (Standard 62–89) speculated that "comfort (odor) criteria are likely to be satisfied if the ventilation rate is set so that 1,000 ppm CO2 is not exceeded"[60] while OSHA has set a limit of 5000 ppm over 8 hours.[61]

Historical ventilation rates
Author or source Year Ventilation rate (IP) Ventilation rate (SI) Basis or rationale
Tredgold 1836 4 CFM per person 2 L/s per person Basic metabolic needs, breathing rate, and candle burning
Billings 1895 30 CFM per person 15 L/s per person Indoor air hygiene, preventing spread of disease
Flugge 1905 30 CFM per person 15 L/s per person Excessive temperature or unpleasant odor
ASHVE 1914 30 CFM per person 15 L/s per person Based on Billings, Flugge and contemporaries
Early US Codes 1925 30 CFM per person 15 L/s per person Same as above
Yaglou 1936 15 CFM per person 7.5 L/s per person Odor control, outdoor air as a fraction of total air
ASA 1946 15 CFM per person 7.5 L/s per person Based on Yahlou and contemporaries
ASHRAE 1975 15 CFM per person 7.5 L/s per person Same as above
ASHRAE 1981 10 CFM per person 5 L/s per person For non-smoking areas, reduced.
ASHRAE 1989 15 CFM per person 7.5 L/s per person Based on Fanger, W. Cain, and Janssen

ASHRAE continues to publish space-by-space ventilation rate recommendations, which are decided by a consensus committee of industry experts. The modern descendants of ASHRAE standard 62-1975 are ASHRAE Standard 62.1, for non-residential spaces, and ASHRAE 62.2 for residences.

In 2004, the calculation method was revised to include both an occupant-based contamination component and an area–based contamination component.[62] These two components are additive, to arrive at an overall ventilation rate. The change was made to recognize that densely populated areas were sometimes overventilated (leading to higher energy and cost) using a per-person methodology.

Occupant Based Ventilation Rates,[62] ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004

IP Units SI Units Category Examples
0 cfm/person 0 L/s/person Spaces where ventilation requirements are primarily associated with building elements, not occupants. Storage Rooms, Warehouses
5 cfm/person 2.5 L/s/person Spaces occupied by adults, engaged in low levels of activity Office space
7.5 cfm/person 3.5 L/s/person Spaces where occupants are engaged in higher levels of activity, but not strenuous, or activities generating more contaminants Retail spaces, lobbies
10 cfm/person 5 L/s/person Spaces where occupants are engaged in more strenuous activity, but not exercise, or activities generating more contaminants Classrooms, school settings
20 cfm/person 10 L/s/person Spaces where occupants are engaged in exercise, or activities generating many contaminants dance floors, exercise rooms

Area-based ventilation rates,[62] ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004

IP Units SI Units Category Examples
0.06 cfm/ft2 0.30 L/s/m2 Spaces where space contamination is normal, or similar to an office environment Conference rooms, lobbies
0.12 cfm/ft2 0.60 L/s/m2 Spaces where space contamination is significantly higher than an office environment Classrooms, museums
0.18 cfm/ft2 0.90 L/s/m2 Spaces where space contamination is even higher than the previous category Laboratories, art classrooms
0.30 cfm/ft2 1.5 L/s/m2 Specific spaces in sports or entertainment where contaminants are released Sports, entertainment
0.48 cfm/ft2 2.4 L/s/m2 Reserved for indoor swimming areas, where chemical concentrations are high Indoor swimming areas

The addition of occupant- and area-based ventilation rates found in the tables above often results in significantly reduced rates compared to the former standard. This is compensated in other sections of the standard which require that this minimum amount of air is delivered to the breathing zone of the individual occupant at all times. The total outdoor air intake of the ventilation system (in multiple-zone variable air volume (VAV) systems) might therefore be similar to the airflow required by the 1989 standard.
From 1999 to 2010, there was considerable development of the application protocol for ventilation rates. These advancements address occupant- and process-based ventilation rates, room ventilation effectiveness, and system ventilation effectiveness[63]

Problems

[edit]
  • In hot, humid climates, unconditioned ventilation air can daily deliver approximately 260 milliliters of water for each cubic meters per hour (m3/h) of outdoor air (or one pound of water each day for each cubic feet per minute of outdoor air per day), annual average.[citation needed] This is a great deal of moisture and can create serious indoor moisture and mold problems. For example, given a 150 m2 building with an airflow of 180 m3/h this could result in about 47 liters of water accumulated per day.
  • Ventilation efficiency is determined by design and layout, and is dependent upon the placement and proximity of diffusers and return air outlets. If they are located closely together, supply air may mix with stale air, decreasing the efficiency of the HVAC system, and creating air quality problems.
  • System imbalances occur when components of the HVAC system are improperly adjusted or installed and can create pressure differences (too much-circulating air creating a draft or too little circulating air creating stagnancy).
  • Cross-contamination occurs when pressure differences arise, forcing potentially contaminated air from one zone to an uncontaminated zone. This often involves undesired odors or VOCs.
  • Re-entry of exhaust air occurs when exhaust outlets and fresh air intakes are either too close, prevailing winds change exhaust patterns or infiltration between intake and exhaust air flows.
  • Entrainment of contaminated outdoor air through intake flows will result in indoor air contamination. There are a variety of contaminated air sources, ranging from industrial effluent to VOCs put off by nearby construction work.[64] A recent study revealed that in urban European buildings equipped with ventilation systems lacking outdoor air filtration, the exposure to outdoor-originating pollutants indoors resulted in more Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) than exposure to indoor-emitted pollutants.[65]

See also

[edit]
  • Architectural engineering
  • Biological safety
  • Cleanroom
  • Environmental tobacco smoke
  • Fume hood
  • Head-end power
  • Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
  • Heat recovery ventilation
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Room air distribution
  • Sick building syndrome
  • Siheyuan
  • Solar chimney
  • Tulou
  • Windcatcher

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Malone, Alanna. "The Windcatcher House". Architectural Record: Building for Social Change. McGraw-Hill. Archived from the original on 22 April 2012.
  2. ^ ASHRAE (2021). "Ventilation and Infiltration". ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals. Peachtree Corners, GA: ASHRAE. ISBN 978-1-947192-90-4.
  3. ^ a b Whole-House Ventilation | Department of Energy
  4. ^ de Gids W.F., Jicha M., 2010. "Ventilation Information Paper 32: Hybrid Ventilation Archived 2015-11-17 at the Wayback Machine", Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC), 2010
  5. ^ Schiavon, Stefano (2014). "Adventitious ventilation: a new definition for an old mode?". Indoor Air. 24 (6): 557–558. Bibcode:2014InAir..24..557S. doi:10.1111/ina.12155. ISSN 1600-0668. PMID 25376521.
  6. ^ ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, ASHRAE, Inc., Atlanta, GA, US
  7. ^ Belias, Evangelos; Licina, Dusan (2024). "European residential ventilation: Investigating the impact on health and energy demand". Energy and Buildings. 304 113839. Bibcode:2024EneBu.30413839B. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113839.
  8. ^ Belias, Evangelos; Licina, Dusan (2022). "Outdoor PM2. 5 air filtration: optimising indoor air quality and energy". Buildings & Cities. 3 (1): 186–203. doi:10.5334/bc.153.
  9. ^ Belias, Evangelos; Licina, Dusan (2024). "European residential ventilation: Investigating the impact on health and energy demand". Energy and Buildings. 304 113839. Bibcode:2024EneBu.30413839B. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113839.
  10. ^ Belias, Evangelos; Licina, Dusan (2023). "Influence of outdoor air pollution on European residential ventilative cooling potential". Energy and Buildings. 289 113044. Bibcode:2023EneBu.28913044B. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113044.
  11. ^ a b Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., Bao, L., Fan, Z. and Sundell, J., 2011. Ventilation and dampness in dorms and their associations with allergy among college students in China: a case-control study. Indoor Air, 21(4), pp.277-283.
  12. ^ Kavanaugh, Steve. Infiltration and Ventilation In Residential Structures. February 2004
  13. ^ M.H. Sherman. "ASHRAE's First Residential Ventilation Standard" (PDF). Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 February 2012.
  14. ^ a b ASHRAE Standard 62
  15. ^ How Natural Ventilation Works by Steven J. Hoff and Jay D. Harmon. Ames, IA: Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, November 1994.
  16. ^ "Natural Ventilation – Whole Building Design Guide". Archived from the original on 21 July 2012.
  17. ^ Shaqe, Erlet. Sustainable Architectural Design.
  18. ^ "Natural Ventilation for Infection Control in Health-Care Settings" (PDF). World Health Organization (WHO), 2009. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
  19. ^ Escombe, A. R.; Oeser, C. C.; Gilman, R. H.; et al. (2007). "Natural ventilation for the prevention of airborne contagion". PLOS Med. 4 (68): e68. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040068. PMC 1808096. PMID 17326709.
  20. ^ Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) "Improving Ventilation In Buildings". 11 February 2020.
  21. ^ Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) "Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities". 22 July 2019.
  22. ^ Dr. Edward A. Nardell Professor of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School "If We're Going to Live With COVID-19, It's Time to Clean Our Indoor Air Properly". Time. February 2022.
  23. ^ "A Paradigm Shift to Combat Indoor Respiratory Infection - 21st century" (PDF). University of Leeds., Morawska, L, Allen, J, Bahnfleth, W et al. (36 more authors) (2021) A paradigm shift to combat indoor respiratory infection. Science, 372 (6543). pp. 689-691. ISSN 0036-8075
  24. ^ Video "Building Ventilation What Everyone Should Know". YouTube. 17 June 2022.
  25. ^ Mudarri, David (January 2010). Public Health Consequences and Cost of Climate Change Impacts on Indoor Environments (PDF) (Report). The Indoor Environments Division, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. pp. 38–39, 63.
  26. ^ "Climate Change a Systems Perspective". Cassbeth.
  27. ^ Raatschen W. (ed.), 1990: "Demand Controlled Ventilation Systems: State of the Art Review Archived 2014-05-08 at the Wayback Machine", Swedish Council for Building Research, 1990
  28. ^ Mansson L.G., Svennberg S.A., Liddament M.W., 1997: "Technical Synthesis Report. A Summary of IEA Annex 18. Demand Controlled Ventilating Systems Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine", UK, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC), 1997
  29. ^ ASHRAE (2006). "Interpretation IC 62.1-2004-06 Of ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004 Ventilation For Acceptable Indoor Air Quality" (PDF). American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 August 2013. Retrieved 10 April 2013.
  30. ^ Fahlen P., Andersson H., Ruud S., 1992: "Demand Controlled Ventilation Systems: Sensor Tests Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine", Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, Boras, 1992
  31. ^ Raatschen W., 1992: "Demand Controlled Ventilation Systems: Sensor Market Survey Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine", Swedish Council for Building Research, 1992
  32. ^ Mansson L.G., Svennberg S.A., 1993: "Demand Controlled Ventilation Systems: Source Book Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine", Swedish Council for Building Research, 1993
  33. ^ Lin X, Lau J & Grenville KY. (2012). "Evaluation of the Validity of the Assumptions Underlying CO2-Based Demand-Controlled Ventilation by a Literature review" (PDF). ASHRAE Transactions NY-14-007 (RP-1547). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 10 July 2014.
  34. ^ ASHRAE (2010). "ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010: Energy Standard for Buildings Except for Low-Rise Residential Buildings". American Society of Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA.
  35. ^ a b "Ventilation. - 1926.57". Osha.gov. Archived from the original on 2 December 2012. Retrieved 10 November 2012.
  36. ^ Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC). "What is smart ventilation?", AIVC, 2018
  37. ^ "Home". Wapa.gov. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 10 November 2012.
  38. ^ ASHRAE, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc, Atlanta, 2002.
  39. ^ "Stone Pages Archaeo News: Neolithic Vinca was a metallurgical culture". www.stonepages.com. Archived from the original on 30 December 2016. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
  40. ^ a b Porter, Dale H. (1998). The Life and Times of Sir Goldsworthy Gurney: Gentleman scientist and inventor, 1793–1875. Associated University Presses, Inc. pp. 177–79. ISBN 0-934223-50-5.
  41. ^ "The Towers of Parliament". www.parliament.UK. Archived from the original on 17 January 2012.
  42. ^ Alfred Barry (1867). "The life and works of Sir Charles Barry, R.A., F.R.S., &c. &c". Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  43. ^ a b Robert Bruegmann. "Central Heating and Ventilation: Origins and Effects on Architectural Design" (PDF).
  44. ^ Russell, Colin A; Hudson, John (2011). Early Railway Chemistry and Its Legacy. Royal Society of Chemistry. p. 67. ISBN 978-1-84973-326-7. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  45. ^ Milne, Lynn. "McWilliam, James Ormiston". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/17747. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  46. ^ Philip D. Curtin (1973). The image of Africa: British ideas and action, 1780–1850. Vol. 2. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 350. ISBN 978-0-299-83026-7. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  47. ^ "William Loney RN – Background". Peter Davis. Archived from the original on 6 January 2012. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  48. ^ Sturrock, Neil; Lawsdon-Smith, Peter (10 June 2009). "David Boswell Reid's Ventilation of St. George's Hall, Liverpool". The Victorian Web. Archived from the original on 3 December 2011. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  49. ^ Lee, Sidney, ed. (1896). "Reid, David Boswell" . Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 47. London: Smith, Elder & Co.
  50. ^ Great Britain: Parliament: House of Lords: Science and Technology Committee (15 July 2005). Energy Efficiency: 2nd Report of Session 2005–06. The Stationery Office. p. 224. ISBN 978-0-10-400724-2. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  51. ^ a b c Janssen, John (September 1999). "The History of Ventilation and Temperature Control" (PDF). ASHRAE Journal. American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 11 June 2014.
  52. ^ Tredgold, T. 1836. "The Principles of Warming and Ventilation – Public Buildings". London: M. Taylor
  53. ^ Billings, J.S. 1886. "The principles of ventilation and heating and their practical application 2d ed., with corrections" Archived copy. OL 22096429M.
  54. ^ "Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health Concentrations (IDLH): Carbon dioxide – NIOSH Publications and Products". CDC. May 1994. Archived from the original on 20 April 2018. Retrieved 30 April 2018.
  55. ^ Lemberg WH, Brandt AD, and Morse, K. 1935. "A laboratory study of minimum ventilation requirements: ventilation box experiments". ASHVE Transactions, V. 41
  56. ^ Yaglou CPE, Riley C, and Coggins DI. 1936. "Ventilation Requirements" ASHVE Transactions, v.32
  57. ^ Tiller, T.R. 1973. ASHRAE Transactions, v. 79
  58. ^ Berg-Munch B, Clausen P, Fanger PO. 1984. "Ventilation requirements for the control of body odor in spaces occupied by women". Proceedings of the 3rd Int. Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Stockholm, Sweden, V5
  59. ^ Joshi, SM (2008). "The sick building syndrome". Indian J Occup Environ Med. 12 (2): 61–64. doi:10.4103/0019-5278.43262. PMC 2796751. PMID 20040980. in section 3 "Inadequate ventilation"
  60. ^ "Standard 62.1-2004: Stricter or Not?" ASHRAE IAQ Applications, Spring 2006. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 12 June 2014.cite web: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) accessed 11 June 2014
  61. ^ Apte, Michael G. Associations between indoor CO2 concentrations and sick building syndrome symptoms in U.S. office buildings: an analysis of the 1994–1996 BASE study data." Indoor Air, Dec 2000: 246–58.
  62. ^ a b c Stanke D. 2006. "Explaining Science Behind Standard 62.1-2004". ASHRAE IAQ Applications, V7, Summer 2006. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 12 June 2014.cite web: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) accessed 11 June 2014
  63. ^ Stanke, DA. 2007. "Standard 62.1-2004: Stricter or Not?" ASHRAE IAQ Applications, Spring 2006. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 12 June 2014.cite web: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) accessed 11 June 2014
  64. ^ US EPA. Section 2: Factors Affecting Indoor Air Quality. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 October 2008. Retrieved 30 April 2009.cite web: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  65. ^ Belias, Evangelos; Licina, Dusan (2024). "European residential ventilation: Investigating the impact on health and energy demand". Energy and Buildings. 304 113839. Bibcode:2024EneBu.30413839B. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113839.
[edit]

Air Infiltration & Ventilation Centre (AIVC)

[edit]
  • Publications from the Air Infiltration & Ventilation Centre (AIVC)

International Energy Agency (IEA) Energy in Buildings and Communities Programme (EBC)

[edit]
  • Publications from the International Energy Agency (IEA) Energy in Buildings and Communities Programme (EBC) ventilation-related research projects-annexes:
    • EBC Annex 9 Minimum Ventilation Rates
    • EBC Annex 18 Demand Controlled Ventilation Systems
    • EBC Annex 26 Energy Efficient Ventilation of Large Enclosures
    • EBC Annex 27 Evaluation and Demonstration of Domestic Ventilation Systems
    • EBC Annex 35 Control Strategies for Hybrid Ventilation in New and Retrofitted Office Buildings (HYBVENT)
    • EBC Annex 62 Ventilative Cooling

International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate

[edit]
  • Indoor Air Journal
  • Indoor Air Conference Proceedings

American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)

[edit]
  • ASHRAE Standard 62.1 – Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality
  • ASHRAE Standard 62.2 – Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Residential Buildings

 

A hygienic drain is an underground pipeline or passage system for moving sewage from homes and business structures (yet not stormwater) to a sewer therapy plant or disposal. Sanitary drains are a type of gravity sewer and belong to an overall system called a "sewer system" or sewage. Sanitary sewers serving enterprise zones may additionally carry industrial wastewater. In districts offered by hygienic sewers, separate tornado drains pipes may communicate surface drainage directly to surface area waters. A benefit of sanitary sewage system systems is that they stay clear of consolidated drain overflows. Sanitary sewage systems are normally much smaller sized in diameter than mixed drains which also carry metropolitan drainage. Back-ups of raw sewage can happen if extreme stormwater inflow or groundwater infiltration takes place because of leaking joints, faulty pipelines and so on in maturing framework.

.

A public bathroom, toilet, washroom or bathroom is an area or small structure with commodes (or rest rooms) and sinks for usage by the public. The centers are available to customers, travelers, workers of a business, institution pupils or detainees. Public toilets are commonly located in many different places: urban locations, workplaces, manufacturing facilities, schools, colleges and other places of work and research study. Likewise, galleries, cinemas, bars, restaurants, and enjoyment locations generally give public toilets. Train stations, loading terminals, and far away public transportation vehicles such as trains, ferryboats, and airplanes typically give toilets for general use. Mobile bathrooms are often readily available at large exterior events. Public commodes are typically separated by sex (or sex) into man and female toilets, although some are unisex (gender-neutral), specifically for tiny or single-occupancy public commodes. Public commodes are occasionally easily accessible to individuals with disabilities. Relying on the society, there may be differing degrees of separation between males and women and different degrees of privacy. Typically, the entire room, or a stall or cubicle including a commode, is lockable. Rest rooms, if present in a male toilet, are usually placed on a wall surface with or without a divider between them. Neighborhood authorities or commercial companies may give public commode facilities. Some are neglected while others are staffed by an assistant. In several cultures, it is customary to tip the attendant, especially if they offer a specific service, such as could be the instance at upscale bars or restaurants. Public commodes might be municipally owned or managed and gotten in directly from the road. Alternatively, they may be within a building that, while independently possessed, allows public gain access to, such as a department store, or it may be limited to business's consumers, such as a dining establishment. Some public commodes are cost free, while others charge a fee. In the last case they are additionally called pay bathrooms and occasionally have a billing turnstile. In one of the most basic form, a public bathroom might just be a street rest room referred to as a pissoir, after the French term. Public toilets are known by numerous various other names depending on the country; instances are: bathroom, shower room, men's space, females's area, washroom (United States); bathroom (Canada); and bathrooms, lavatories, water closet (W. C. ), ladies and gents (Europe).

.

Frequently Asked Questions

**Technology plays a crucial role in the sustainable disposal of porta potty waste by enabling efficient waste collection, transportation, and treatment processes. Advanced systems can monitor and manage waste flow, optimize treatment methods, and ensure compliance with environmental standards, ultimately contributing to more sustainable waste management practices.**